Thursday, October 2, 2008

Opinion of BNP

At this time, the British National Party BNP represents Britain's best political hope to stop the Islamification of Great Britain. Attempts to marginalize, vilify, politically correctify this party by labeling it as racist has been ineffective because the British people have no other organized political movement that takes an aggressive stance in reversing the reportedly and often misstated idea that the Islamification of Great Britain is inevitable. The BNP request support from native Brits or others of original European stock only as they say but makes no claim to racial superiority, just a claim to being different, culturally, ancestrally, historically and ask why that request can not that be accepted? They ask people outside the native stock to limit their support by saying please do not support! Voiceless within other political parties, what choice do the British have? The destruction of their culture and heritage is not negotiable. Read their forums and posts, there is rarely anything different posted in these forums that is not posted in any American anti-jihadist site except the underlying and more so overlying belief in most forums that Great Britain is lost and Islamification is their destiny. There lies the difference, this is not accepted by British patriots and certainly not the BNP. I don't find them using the ridiculous and archaic term clash of civilization, but instead civil war. If anything many Brits believe civil war is their countries' destiny, not Islamification, if the political process fails. This is certainly a swelling sentiment in British society well outside the BNP. With all other political parties pandering for the immigrant vote, ignoring and suppressing the anti-elitist sentiments, how can there be a sustainable political effort to stop Islamification? If nothing else, the BNP's continued growth will turn the other political parties around, compel them listen, make them compete for BNP voters and supporters, which may end Britain's cultural and historical suffication.

No comments: