Official Islam By Bill Warner

The true nature of Islam is revealed in its sacred texts and its history. But, there is another Islam--Official Islam--that has been revealed by Obama in Cairo. He made official what the media, politicians and the universities have pushed since 9/11.

Here are the major points of Official Islam:

· Islam is a religion similar to Christianity and Judaism. They all worship the same god.
· Good Muslims prove that Islam is good
· There are no jihadists, just extremists
· Islam must be accommodated in as many ways as possible
· One of the proofs of Islam's greatness is the Islamic Golden Age, humanity's best days
· Violence by Muslims is due to their being poor and abused
· Islam gave the West its basis for our intellectual world
· The Crusades were a great evil by Christians
· There are moderate Muslims and a few extremist Muslims
· "Extremists" cause the violence· Islam is found in the Koran (never discuss Mohammed)
· The "bad stuff" in the Koran is only due to its interpretation
· Good Muslims will reform the "extremists"
· Islam is the religion of tolerance· Islam has a Golden Rule
· Islam is the religion of freedom and justice

But the official version of Islam is a *Big Lie. The fact that the Official Islam does not agree with the Koran, Sira and Hadith is of no importance, since it is not based upon them. Official Islam is based upon the propaganda of the Muslim Brotherhood. Not one line of the Official Islam is totally true and many of the points are complete fabrications.

At best, some assertions are partially true. A half-truth is a lie. When you testify in our courts you have to swear an oath: I swear to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth.Official Islam is not only made up of half-truths, but it also has points that contain no truth, e.g. Islam is the religion of tolerance, so it contains both half-truths and total lies. There is not a single statement in it that it completely true. It is a Big Lie. Anyone who does not agree with these points is labeled a bigot and will be condemned by all of the official non-bigots, those who believe the Big Lie. The oddest thing is that they make moral judgments about those who do not believe. They say that if you don't believe in the Big Lie, you are a bigoted Islamophobe.Official Islam cannot be proved and is delivered by "authorities." It is based upon authoritarian thinking-believe it because those who have more power that you say it is true. We must use truth and critical/scientific thinking to destroy the Big Lie of Official Islam. Official Islam is the mind of denial and delusion and is the intellectual basis of the destruction of our civilization.

* BIG LIE: Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, MA, 1971, pgs. 231, 232. All this was inspired by the principle--which is quite true in itself--that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.

Source: Political Islam

Quote of the Day: Regarding the Increasing Levels of Jewish Persecution in France

Once upon a time there was the Holocaust...and there was a perfect rational for the CREATION of Israel. Today, what's happening in Europe is total validation for the CONTINUED EXISTENCE of the Jewish State. Chezwick_Mac

The office of Charlie Hebdo newspaper in Paris was recently fire bombed.  The satirical magazine had publish a notice that they are changing their name to Sharia Hebdo and that Mohammed himself would be the new editor.  Following this violent intimidation, this was the magazines response:

Love is Stronger than Hate

I'm not endorsing this magazine or their work, but their courage and reaction. Xeriscapist

Greater Israel on Facebook?

The Greater Israel concept has come to Facebook. But who is behind it?  Why would anyone advertize this concept on the social network?  I am trying to find out. My first step was to research the general concept by checking the Biblical texts.  A very insightful article was written by Daniel Pipes in 1994 that is still relevant today.  Obviously whoever set up the Great Israel Facebook page did it to stir up Allah's Mischief-makers if in fact it was not one of clan that actually set up the site. The threats were vicious so the site appears to have vanished, not threats against the site or the creators, threats of slaughter against all Jews!  Even suggest the concept of a Greater Israel, from the above article, it is supposed this is more of a suggestion by Blackstonians than Jews, is much worse than shouting fire in a crowded building.  Even discussing a Greater Israel stimulates the Wild Stampede and it is for that very reason a Greater Israel may be set in motion. What the wicked fears will come upon him, but the desire of the righteous will be granted. Proverbs 10:24

The Preservered of Jacob and the Gentile Believers

Since the books of the new testament are also Jewish in origin, most books are letters addressed to Greek and Jewish congregations of believers, it’s not at all unusual that Jewish believers would accept them as inspired. The two groups as delineated by both what are called the old and new testaments, cannot be separated. Isaiah 49:6:


“It is too light a thing that you should be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob and to bring back the preserved of Israel; I will make you as a light for the nations, that my salvation may reach to the end of the earth.” The word salvation here is the Hebrew word yeshua ישועתי



Jesus (Yeshua) was named Salvation. The nickname in English from the Greek is Jesus, for the Arabs it was Issa. But when Jesus walked on earth no one said “Jesus” or “Issa”, those all came later.  It was Yeshua and to the Hebrew ear it was Salvation. We have to answer why was he named Jesus Christ, that is, ‘Salvation, the Anointed One?’

If you have ever watched a movie about Jesus that is in English, he is always called Jesus:  From Hebrew, to Greek, to English. There the entire meaning of the name is lost.  Pretending you were back in the days when Jesus walked in the world and the language was English rather than Hebrew and what would you hear?  "Look here comes Jesus Christ!"?  How about, "Look, here comes Yeshua the Messiah!"? No, you would hear, "Look here comes Salvation, the Anointed One!"

Because we have been separated from the Jewishness of the texts, we have been separated from knowing all the fullness that these text have for us. So whether you say Jesus, Yeshua or Salvation, it is the same name and the same Son of God. Those that believe in him are of the same fold.

Somalis For Jesus: Somali Refugees in Libya Need Your Help Now

Somalis For Jesus: Somali Refugees in Libya Need Your Help Now: "Dr. Yusuf Dirir Ali, MDThursday, Feb. 24, 2011 Hundreds of Somali refugees are stranded in Libya. There are reports coming from Libya stati..."

The Joys of Being Free of Islam

Inspiration from the growing movement to Free Iran of Islam has added a new level of appreciation for and awareness of a freedom that most people enjoy, freedom from Blackstonianism. Everyday we are faced with news stories and of Mohammadans persecuting Christians, women, non-cult members and themselves. It is hard not to share the victim’s pain and this empathy of course will never change. But to wake up each day and be Blackstonian free gives a great sense of personal joy. To end each day with a calm sense of this freedom adds to this joy.



Free from the angry ravings of Mohammad & Mohammadans,
Free from ramadan,
Free from animal sacrifice,
Free from the headcoverings,
Freedom from blackstonian duplicity,
Freedom of thought and conscience,
Freedom from the sin of Islam,
Free from Islamic historical propaganda,
Free of mosques,
Free of imams,
Free of the koran,
Free of Muhammad’s biography,
Free of the old raider’s sayings,
Free of the moon god’s observances & traditions,
Freedom to test the Truth,
Freedom to live a godly life,
Freedom from the backwardness of Islamic controlled societies,
Freedom to seek God


The Mohammadan strife against people will continue, I suppose, until its inevitable decline and demise, but the joy will always continue.

Alpha Arae Reasoning of Blackstonianism

Every word of the Koran came from the mouth of Mohammad. Blackstonians never attribute any of the words of the Koran to any other human being, though historically this is arguably in doubt. But assume for now this is true. If so, each word came to his mouth from his mind. The only reference that these words came from the Blackstonian version of the Biblical Angel Gabriel was Mohammad. The only testimony that the words given to Mohammad from the Blackstonian version of the Biblical Angel  Gabriel came from the Arabic god Allah was Mohammad. All the words of the Koran praising Mohammad, exhortations to follow his example, all the commands to obey Mohammad, and thus obeying the god Allah was from the mind of Mohammad. The debate of where Mohammad's mind obtained the words, from the Blackstonian angel Jibril who does not appear in actions anything like the Biblical Gabriel , from the devil or a demon, from his own experiences, observations, scrambled within a complex abnormal brain and spat out distorted from seizures , cave gas , congenital, or acquired mental and physical disorders, or a combination of or all of the above, that debate will continue unresolved. But it remains, the words came from his mind. And thus was created and remains, Blackstonian Circle of Reasoning that has and will entraps and enslaves every Mohammadan.


In any discussion with a Blackstonian, any debate or discourse, The Mohammadan cannot rid himself from this reasoning. Knowing this they will search for other proofs but all within the confines of what came from Mohammad's mind/mouth. Often now they will give fallacious and at times humorous explanations of science within the Koran, the words from Mohammad's mouth.   Or the shop-worn statement of how such a book could not have been written by man (words from Mohammad's mouth), and by the way, yes it could have. I'll refer you to The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain, a book with as much science as the Koran, without grammatical error, free of contradictions and certainly more uplifting. In fact I challenge anyone to find one contradiction in the entire novel, just one scientific error. Each and every word came from the mind of Samuel Clemens.

To avoid facing this one steadfast fact of their flawed reasoning, Blackstonians need to keep speaking in circles, deceive others and themselves, faster and faster the spin, while changing the subject and pointing to others, pushing forward as if hoping to reach a fictitious place and time when no one is left to question the dizziness of it all.

Drawing Mohammad: A Civil Right and a Religious Duty

Mohammed's Kartoon Kafirs


by Kenneth Roberts

May 28, 2010



In the TV sitcom 'Green Acres', Oliver Wendell Douglas, a New York attorney runs for public office against the popular incumbent. A rumor starts, suggesting that Douglas had been debarred as a lawyer. Though not true, the rural folk keep repeating the lie during the campaign, until everyone accepts it as an established fact… and besides, it's highly amusing to repeat the slander. Candidate Douglas is frustrated beyond endurance. Even though he is an accomplished attorney, he doesn't stand a chance against this entrenched prejudice.



In the Koran, Mohammed uses the same technique. All sorts of things in the Koran are no more than cartoonish misrepresentations of people and other religions, but Moslems have no problem accepting them as established facts, merely because Mohammed said so and repeated them over and over, giving them divine authority… and besides, Mohammed's caricatures are highly amusing! Cartoons work. Hyperbole works. They entertain. They work viscerally by circumventing the intellect and appealing directly to the emotions through laughter and sneering mockery. A thing doesn't have to be true to be fun!



Mocking outsiders is fun! It puts 'them' down, puts 'us' above them and thus dehumanizes 'them'. 'We' get control of 'them'.



According to Mohammed, not only do kafir-subhumans deserve to be mocked, but they basically lack a right to share the earth with Moslems. They are on earth by the kind permission and mercy of Moslems who magnanimously restrain themselves from removing the kafirs altogether. By mocking their legitimate overlords (the Moslems), kafirs lose their right to exist on earth. That is the Sunna, the example, of Mohammed.



In the TV episode, lawyer Douglas starts shouting, 'I was not debarred!' but no one hears him over the howls of bemused laughter. Mohammed discovered how effective laughing at one's opponents could be. He mocked all who didn't follow him, starting with the Jews, calling them sons of pigs and apes, and at other times calling them 'donkeys carrying the Taurat'. Mohammed refused to pronounce it 'Torah'. He distorted the names of people in the Bible as well, no doubt to make them sound funny. He told humiliating stories about Biblical heroes. Abraham had a humorous scrotal hernia. Talking rocks stole Abraham's clothes and ran away with them. Solomon bends over and overhears the language of ants. Trees, clouds and other objects in nature come alive and speak. Such imagery could come out of Tom and Jerry, but it is there in Mohammed's holy book revealed by his god, who only communicated with Mohammed. Mohammed also hired writers to lampoon his enemies in limericks. Mohammed could not take a joke at his own expense. No! Mohammed's narcissism was sacred! And poking fun at it was an unforgivable act of high treason punishable by death! He had writers assassinated who lampooned him.



Of course, as with other matters, Mohammed gave himself a monopoly on cartoons. He wanted his opponents to be unarmed in the matter of satirizing him…as do pious Moslems today. Today, Moslems claim the right to satirize Jews, Americans, the British, the Pope and anyone else. But no one may satirize them. Moslems place themselves and their collective offended narcissism above comment. To criticize Moslems is an act of high treason against our divinely-appointed overlords!



We are never told why Mohammed's narcissism needs defending more than another's narcissism. We are merely told that Mohammed taught his followers to defend his narcissism by assassinating critics…and that this is confirmed in Islamic law.



Since Moslems claim a monopoly on lampooning, Moslems expect to fight opponents whose two hands are tied behind their backs. They expect to control all debate, so no one talks back. They expect to behead all verbal critique of Islam by removing freedom of speech from our writers, teachers and politicians. They would behead kafirs societies by silencing their leaders who are charged with hearing, speaking and thinking for the benefit of the body politick. They would silence opposition to Islam with a slice of the scimitar of censorship! This is being done by violence and threats of violence.



Mohammed considered resistance to his censorship as unspeakable insolence that must be attacked with the utmost fury! Mohammed's narcissism would not bear the smallest slight. So he found a way to stop it. All laughter stops when a person picks up a knife. According to Mohammed, such murder pleases Allah.



When Mohammed sent out his followers armed with knives, the mockers stopped mockery in Arabia forever. Anyone who disagreed with Mohammed left the country immediately, leaving Mohammed in complete control of all communications.

Today Moslems still demand a monopoly on mockery, a monopoly on satire, a monopoly on cartoons. They want a safe position above the debate from which they can verbally lay into others. Islamic mockery goes only one way…towards the kafirs.



Mohammed's mockery of Christian doctrines was as satirical as his mockery of the Jews. Mohammed's slanders of Christianity are some of the worst examples of his cartooning! The easiest and most distinctive Christian doctrine to remember is that of the divine Trinity, three persons in one God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost. Rather than admit he understood the clearly worded message, Mohammed intentionally distorted it as 'Father, Mother Mary and Son of God'. He obviously knew Mary was not part of the Trinity. He knew what he was doing. He was drawing a cartoon in which he removed the Holy Ghost from the picture. The first cult object tossed from the Kaaba by Mohammed was an image of a dove, the symbol of the Holy Spirit.



Why was the Holy Ghost such a danger to Mohammed? Sometimes people reveal what frightens them by never mentioning what they fear! Mohammed never mentions the Holy Ghost. The gentle dove represents spiritual stillness, tameness and the Golden Rule. Their opposite qualities are activity, ferocity and opportunism. A world-conquering empire needed energetic warriors with the latter qualities, rather than contemplative Christian monks in a monastery preaching benevolence towards one's enemies.



Mohammed's ultimate mockery of Christians was to mock the Virgin Mary by flying to heaven and make her his bride. Mohammed became the father of all Christians. His mockery of Christians was then almost complete.



Practically everything Mohammed said about Christianity was a caricature and a distortion. In a final cartoon of Christianity, Mohammed claimed Jesus would return to betray and butcher his own followers and then break the crosses they possessed as the symbols of the Golden Rule! This is an astonishing cartoon caricature of everything Christians consider holy and a revelation of Mohammed's psychology of betrayal!



The worst part of Mohammed's cartoons is that not only is he caricaturing the original doctrines, but he then claims that his cartoon represents THE TRUE IMAGE of them! Jewish and Christian doctrines as defined by the Jews and Christians themselves are wrong! Only Mohammed's cartoons are THE TRUE doctrines.



No professional cartoonist would ever claim that! Cartoonists live enough in reality to know that their cartoons are highly exaggerated misrepresentations emphasizing a humorous aspect of events or personalities.



If Mohammed thought his cartoons were REAL, he had obviously left reality.



Koranic cartoons misrepresenting Jews, Christians and the pluralistic, cultured Arabs of Mohammed's day are not reality, but Mohammed's distorted comic strips, which Moslems have accepted as THE TRUTH ever since.



Mohammed could not tell the difference between a cartoon and reality…or at least he pretended not to, if it was in his own political interest. This makes Mohammed a cynical, scheming politician, rather than a sincere spiritual leader. Was he mad or a schemer?



Mohammed's cartoons of 'others' in the Koran are no more real than the evil and dehumanizing cartoons of Jews that appeared for 20 years in the Nazi propaganda newspaper, Der Stürmer. The purpose of these cartoons was the same as Mohammed's Koranic Kafir Kartoons …to dehumanize the victims, make them out to be diseased animals and give Moslems the emotional freedom to treat these subhumans violently.







Permalink
copyright (c) CBSX, LLC

Courtesy of politicalislam.com

Oppose the Cordoba Initiative Mega-Mosque in New York

From http://www.answeringmuslims.com/

Defend our nation from this unwanted intrusion. If Feisal and his co-weasels wish to honor our dead, build a monument to them in Malaysia!

Feisal go home!

David Horowitz's Complete Lecture at UCSD

David Horowitz's recent lecture at the University of San Diego during what is now referred to as "Hitler Youth Week" is so impressive that I needed to post the complete lecture here.  It is well known he got a student to admit being in favor of efforts to exterminate the Jews, that short exchange over-shadowed the passion and brilliance of his speech. 

Thus, I encourage you to listen to all 6 parts, throw on headphones and view other applications if necessary but this will keep your attention:



Part 2



Part 3




Part 4




Part 5



Part 6

Reminders of the Armenian Genocide

The world is not waiting with breath held for an American president to declare the Armenian Genocide a genocide, history has already decided that. When the current president had made the campaign promise, (also here) to do so, he or his associates were it seems not aware that one day they had to face the same thuggery as had the Armenians. Now with Turkish bullies about, plans and hopes for the rebirth of the Ottoman Empire and the march of Islamization that abruptly ended after World War 1 continues. Short of calling the event a genocide, the president apparently attempts to move to what he perceives as a moderate position last week by calling this genocide "one of the worst atrocities" of the twentieth century and a "devastating chapter of history" as if to put this all in the past.

The Armenian Genocide was not only one of the worst atrocities of the twentieth century, it was one of the worst in the history of humankind. Of course it was a devastating chapter of history but the chapter is not completely written as the living Armenians are still at risk since the forces in Turkey that led to the Genocide are being rekindled.  No, Nationalistic Muslim Turks do not view this new position as moderate or conciliatory. In their view a moderate statement would be "the genocide did not happen" or "the Christian Armenians were traitors and deserved this annihilation" and thus have called the president's statements through the Turkish foreign minister as "unacceptable".


Of course it was one the worst atrocities, of course it was devastating, of course it was the Muslim Turks that perpetrated this unspeakable crime against God and man.

Brief starting point for this histororical event: Armenian Genocide


"After World War I the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) - more commonly known as the "Young Turks" - decided to carry out a genocide against the Armenian people under Ottoman control. It is estimated that one and a half million Armenians were massacred between 1915 and 1923, out of the previous population of around two million. The Armenians were subjected to torture, massacre and expropriation of their wealth. The great majority of the Armenians were forced from their homes in Armenia and Anatolia and left to die of hunger and thirst in Syria where they fled.


There was a strong outcry in the United States, United Kingdom, France and Russia against the mistreatment of the Armenians. The Allies demanded that the Young Turks be tried for warcrimes. However, there was no intervention beyond helping the small remainder of the Armenians who were still alive in Syria. After the war there were no restitutions to the Armenian people for their loss of wealth and human lives by the Ottomans."

Excerpt from: http://www.religionfacts.com/islam/history/ottoman.htm

Leaving Islam? Bus Ads are Reinstated in Miami

This is America, you do have a choice.  The above ad was produced and is being displayed by the Freedom Defense Initiative. Robert Spencer, director of Jihad Watch announced today that this ad will again be displayed on buses in Miami after the Transit Authority of Miami temporarily removed the ads following pressure from Islamic supremacists of CAIR.   Please contact RefugeFromIslam.com if you know in your heart it is time to make this decision.  Not only is this a victory for American free speech, it is a victory for those trapped within Cult of Mohammad and who wish to free themselves despite family and community pressure.  Mr. Spencer also has announced that this campaign will go national so I encourage those who enjoy their liberty to contribute and support this effort.

Millions each year leave Mohammad's monotheism within all countries.  In America for instance, many trace their roots to Arab countries but still the majority of those who do are not followers of Mohammadism. 

Good Friday and the End of the Event

This is the day some Christians celebrate the death of Yeshua Messiah, Jesus Christ. One has in part feelings of sadness for the suffering of the Savior and we do dwell on this, yet we know the end of the story. We know of the resurrection and ascension without which Yeshua's death would not even have been recorded, at least as a significant event. But He was seen by at least 500 people according to the Bible and that is collaborated by the events that followed, the persecution and killing of around 10,000 Jewish believers soon followed. They were so convinced of His resurrection and ascension they could not deny their own beliefs to save their lives. I read the historical account of some of their executions, being burned to illuminate the coliseum, covered with animal skins then torn apart by lions. The author who I now do not remember, along with his fellow Romans considered the Christians evil but still were amazed and perplexed at their apparent inability to recant their faith. That is how strong they believed in Good Friday and how the event ended.


A little history of Easter here and here.

Easter is probably one of the oldest celebrated holidays in

the world; it just hasn't always gone under that name. It is

in fact the Catholic Church that dubbed the celebration of

this all important holiday Easter, and in fact moved the

date to converge with Hebrew and Pagan holidays so that when

the celebration was held it was held by all folk. But

because of this, pagan symbols worked their way into the

holiday, hence the rabbit and the eggs, which in ancient

religions symbolized fertility.



Some historians have researched the origin of the name and

believe that it derives from ancient Norsemen dialect

"Eostur" or "Ostar" or "Eastar" meaning "season of the

growing sun" or "season of new birth." But the name "Easter"

has also been proscribed to an old goddess of Teutonic

mythology. St. Bede, an eighth century English historian,

traced the name back to a goddess named Eostre or Eastre of

Anglo-Saxon origin. She was the goddess of Spring and the

whole month of April was dedicated to her. Interestingly,

her symbol was the hare….





It is also during this time that the pagan holiday of the

Rites of Spring on the Vernal Equinox is celebrated. This

was a brilliant move by the Catholic Church to get people to

join the church and break from pagan tradition and still be

able to celebrate their beliefs. Pagans during that time

celebrated the return of the Sun God which was an easy shift

for them to then believe in the resurrection of the Son of

God who saved them from our sins and death.



Pasted from http://petcaretips.net/easter-history.html Read the entire article.

After the fact, many have come and tried to explain this event. Many convince themselves that this is all mythology or that Yeshua did not die, the further from the event in time the easier it is to dismiss it. The misinterpretation of some photos from the Apollo moon landings led to some to conclude the landings never happened. A ridiculous idea that would have to involve possibly a 100,000 silent conspirators! Yet a poll in 2009 indicated that 25% of Brits did not believe man landed on the moon. http://kn.theiet.org/news/jul09/moon-landing-survey.cfm

I believe if I live long enough, some day I will hear of a theory that the twin towers in New York never really existed.

Al Qaeda, Mujahideen
Talibani, Moderate
Sunni..................Shi'ite
Car Burning Parisians.
Extremist, Radical
Ka'ab Bowing, Mohammadan
Secular, Musselman
"Death to the American"
Allah, Gay-A-Brel
Offended Pakistan
Copt Killing Egypt-chee-an
Quran, Hadiths
Sunna, Ummah
Fan-atic Mozz-A-Lim
Devout or Secularized
Its still all Izz-A-Lem
Mohound Achmed of Amsterdam
Bomb-er or Terrorist
Imans from Birmingham
Holy or Holey
However you call the Ko-Ran
Ayatollah Komedian:
There's no fun in Izz-A-Lem
"you pig, you dog, you Chrish-Chee-An"
Wiping out Armenians
Con-A-Verted Africans
Arabized Iranians
Kiss a Blackstone, Moham did
Why can't you just say it? Izz-A-Lem

Islam Now the Victim of the Fort Hood Massacre?

Coverage: the question is constantly asked, Why? Why? Why? No one who has read Ali Sina, Robert Spencer or many others asks this question. Instead they stand, watching others groping around as if in a dark room, hands stretched out asking why, why, why while somehow blocking out the constant reminder that the room is well lit and to simply open their eyes.

The families of the true victims, the killed and wounded, who received the life destroying, life shortening knock at the door or "the call", the blow to the stomach that some will recover from and others won't, the kids of a dead mom, parents, brothers & sisters, friends, who have received "the knock at the door' or "the call" are also the true victims.

It is of no commendation for those who practice Blackstonianism to denounce acts of mass murder, after all Koran 9:111 guarantees paradise to those who are kill or are killed for Allah. This community must institute in every mosque and every school the error of these Koranic teachings instead of claiming victimhood.

Koranic veres not only explain violence toward other people but also explain Islamic cohesion and that cohesion can be reduced to one word: Fear. Fear of hell, fear of burning, fear of punishment is the entire basis of Blackstonianism.

This fear surrounds the Muslim, in a sense like a ring a fire leaving no path of escape except to walk into the flames of their own fear and if and when that happens, they discover the fear (flames) was all an illusion.

Iranian Change? Throw Away the Meccan Compass

At best this is one form of Islam replacing another, a temporary modification or moderation means nothing as Islamic controlled states tend to eventually revert back to their feral state when troubles come, and they will. Islam is a non-reformable political ideology. How would you reform communism? The growing voices within Iran to listen to are those that wish to drive Islam out of Persian society altogether.

Iranians are the historical victims of conquest and the Islamic/Arabic conquest has brought nothing good. Support those who want to free themselves and their nation from Islamic control.

Notes on Brunei

Brunei Pronouced bru-'nai, check the CIA Factbook or Wikipedia for a few quick facts, then consider that Brunei owes its prosperity and wealth nearly exclusively as an energy supplier to the industrial nations and that need for inexpensive and abundant energy. Thus, this small Islamic controlled country and member of the Organization of Islamic Conferences (OIC) situated along the coast of the South China Sea and ruled by one family for over 600 years has sold the vestiges of this present earth’s ancestors; the remains of the dead bodies of once living organisms. Morphed over time into a substance containing the past energy of the sun that we call oil.

John, a disciple of Jesus Christ the Son of God, recorded a vision he had while on a Greek Island several thousand years ago. Just after he saw what could be the first Islamic beast rise from sea he saw what could be a second Islamic beast rise from the earth. Why the earth as a symbol? Oil. Oil gave life to the beast. In books and websites about tiny, wealthy, prosperous, peaceful Brunei the great mosques are showcased, built from the wealth of oil. Majestic it could be said. Certainly they are the largest and tallest of the buildings which infers to its subjects and supposedly to others, the supremacy of Islam. In reality it was the vestiges of the bodies of the earth’s past life forms that have been resurrected by rig and pump that brought the wealth and the resurgence of modern Islam, that second lamb-like dragon-speaking beast of John’s vision.

In the 1400’s the introduction of Islam to Brunei was due to trade inducements rather than the sword and has been propagated by an unbroken string of 29 sultans. The state is controlled by political Islam, a sharia based system that the muslim inhabitants called Melayu Islam Beraja (MIB). Though its constitution does lip service to freedom of religion at best, Brunei merely allows the Christian religion and Chinese ideologies to exist in a tightly controlled fashion. Beliefs other than the state controlled system, cannot be taught in any school, nor spoken about in public. Christian schools must teach anti-Christian Islam. Religious symbols are illegal except for state controlled Islamic symbols.

An example of one such symbol is the national flag. As with other Islamic controlled states the flag contains Arab script and the crescent moon. From a Christian viewpoint the crescent is a very appropriate symbol for Islam. The first chapter of Genesis tells how God created two lights, greater light was the sun that ruled the day, and the lessor was the moon that ruled the night. This waning crescent is not a true light in itself but a reflection of the sun off a cold, lifeless rock; the light that rules the night. A waning crescent whose next phase is a moonless night of darkness. Now the flags of the armed forces for Brunei contain Islam’s other symbol, the crossed swords, which symbolizes violence, conquest, death and forced rule.

As the state continues to move forward with its philosophy of a purer Islam and when oil incomes and wealth begin to wane like the crescent moon, pray for those remaining Christians and Chinese. As in other Islamic controlled nations, they may become scapegoats and dealt with harshly by a populace carried along by the ever-darkening momentum force of seeking a purer Islam.

The government assists muslim subjects financially for trips to Mecca in Saudi Arabia. Before starting this trip the participants need to repeat a specific prayer to their god. For Christians it should be noted that the chant contains what amounts to be a distortion of and denial of the deity of Christ: Thou art without associate. The Islamic beast forces this denial and the Brunei muslim using that specific prayer called the talbrijah, unknowingly rejects the mercy, grace and love of God. After entering the mosque in Mecca (right foot first) they then ask for their god to forgive their sins.

Several organizations online ask for your prayer regarding Brunei and if you are interested take the time to pray. Here are some suggested guidelines. Bring a few fish or a few loaves to the Lord, or find a smooth stone, who can say what may be the result!

This is an opinion piece and I am not affiliated with any of the linked sites.

Prelude to a Study of Islamic Controlled Counties

Many years ago, after I read the story of how Jesus Christ sent a legion of demons into a herd of swine, the swine ran down a slope into the sea and drowned, my question was, what happen to this legion of demons and why were the details of this story even recorded in the Bible? (Mark 5:11)

John in Revelations writes, "Then I stood on the sand of the sea. And I saw a beast rising out of the sea." (Rev. 13:1) My understanding has been that the sea symbolized people or nations but perhaps there is a spiritual connection to both verses. Traditionally the beast rising out of the sea had been interpreted as some western entity, Europe some say. Other Eastern Christians see the Islamic beast and the wounded head the defeat of the Ottoman Empire and with this others see the wound as the end of Islamic Caliph cerca 1913. The wounded head is healed and Islam resurges. Afterwards John sees a beast rise out of the earth. Out of the earth? What did that symbolize? Oil related? This next beast is like a lamb, symbolizing a peaceful religion, Islam ‘lite’, the new secular Islam, but it "speaks like a dragon". Islam’s resurgence is from oil wealth, "out of the earth". This lamb has two horns, sunni and shiite? Eastern Islam and Western Islam?


Read Revelation 13 regarding the two beasts, the image that is given life (the Koran?) and understand the Christian’s dilemma in muslim controlled countries. Egypt and Brunei come to mind immediately with their ID cards that states the holder’s religion. The mark of the beast is a subject for another day and blog but consider the Greek letters that symbolized six hundred sixty and six certainly to an Arabic reader do appear to be read "in the name of Allah", the bismillah followed by the Islamic symbol of crossed swords. This is detailed in Walid Shoebat’s book God’ Was on Terror. But I will go just a little further with that connection later. Shoebat points out that these symbols, the bismillah and crossed swords are worn on Islamic headbands and armbands. As I study further each individually muslim controlled country, I’ll mention the symbols on flags and other cultural icons. I do not use the term muslim countries, as Islam and its control is temporary. This tenet of faith is reinforced by continuing to follow the beast thread in Revelations. Read it yourself and see the future and end of Islam.

Was the founder of Islam a war criminal?

Though Islam is promoted by it's members and pundits to the uninitiated as simply a religion, questionable messages from group members such as number of members that follow this ideology, are in fact political statements. The discussion of religion is endless between the the West and Islam, and continually confusing to ordinary people yet it should be argued that ideologically everything religious about Islam is summed up in one thought stated around 40-50 AD many centuries before Islam was developed: You believe in one God, that's great! So do demons and they tremble. Aside from this and the pre-Islamic Arab traditions and rituals subsequently incorporated along with the personal idiosyncrasies of the founder(s) that were progressively added to help flesh out an adopted creed, it should be argued there is little religious substance within this political system to speak of. So it is necessary to ask many thoughtful questions regarding the politics of Islam, without bringing up the subject of Islam's religious aspect. For example, from a political point of view, though the founder of Islam did not engage in battles against armies but instead raids against commercial caravans and civilian populations, to say that the founder was engaged in war is true and thus the actions should be judged in a political sense using historical and modern criteria.

The religious aspect of Islam can be seen as a veneer and thus instead be regarded as a political system. It is and always was a political movement so Americans need to ask questions like, do we believe political groups such as Islam should be free and unrestricted within the USA in their implied and stated political goal of dominating all other non-members individuals and groups? If you doubt Islam's religious aspect is only a thin covering for a political/power system, consider the following statistical study here. Only 2.6% of the Koran "talks about the overall good of humanity", while the majoring of Koran (61%) speaks "ills of unbelievers or calls for their violent conquest and subjugation".

Other questions might be, do Americans believe it is moral for members of political organizations such as Islam to deceive non-members if it is in the best interest to the growth of their organization and to retain such practices within their founding documents? Do Americans believe political groups such as Islam should retain and have the right to practice, display, spread or advocate violent, oppressive, hateful and bigoted articles written in their founding documents?
Again, one god, lots of rituals, adopted tenets; got it, ignored, now deal with this political movement and its messages and actions.

Westerner's Guide to Muslim Psychology

2006 Article by Isaac Schrodinger 2006

Islam and the Psychology of the Musulman By Andre Servier 1222 (Translated 1923 to English: Free Online)

The Arab Mind by Raphael Patai 2007 (Originally Published in 1983) Cultural Psychology

Understanding Muhammad by Ali Sina 2008
"Muslims must be weaned from Islam for humanity to live in peace," says Ali Sina

The Sociology of Jihad, How Rational People Commit Atrocities Political Islam Site, Dr. Bill Warner 2009